Use of full sterile barrier precautions during insertion of arterial catheters: a randomized trial.
نویسندگان
چکیده
To investigate whether institution of maximal sterile barrier precautions (SBPs) during arterial catheter (AC) insertion prevents catheter colonization, as is the case for central venous catheters (CVCs), a randomized study was conducted. Three hundred seventy-three patients in whom a radial or dorsalis pedis AC was going to be inserted were randomized to an SBP group or a standard-of-care group. These patients, in addition to all patients who were admitted to the unit with an AC already in place or who were not eligible for the randomized study, were observed for AC-related colonization and infection. Data for 272 randomized patients were available for analysis. The colonization incidence was 20.2 cases per 1000 catheter-days in the SBP group and 15.8 cases per 1000 catheter-days in the control group (P>.1). AC-related infection occurred in 3 patients in the SBP group and in 7 patients in the control group (P>.1). Five episodes of AC-related bloodstream infection were diagnosed (1.5 cases per 1000 catheter-days). Use of SBPs did not prevent AC colonization or infection. The incidence of AC-related infectious complications was comparable to the incidence of CVC-related infection reported in the literature.
منابع مشابه
Insertion and use of arterial catheters: a survey of clinician antiseptic technique.
RATIONALE Recent studies have shown that the incidence of bloodstream infections (BSIs) associated with arterial catheters (ACs) is comparable to that of central venous catheters (CVCs). In 2011, the CDC published guidelines recommending the use of limited barrier precautions during AC insertion. The goal of this study was to assess the attitudes and current antiseptic techniques employed by ph...
متن کاملEffect of different sterile barrier precautions and central venous catheter dressing on the skin colonization around the insertion site.
AIM The purpose of this prospective, randomized, controlled study was the comparison of maximal sterile barrier (consisting of mask, cap, sterile gloves, gown, large drape) vs control precautions (mask, cap, sterile gloves, small drape) and of transparent polyurethan film vs gauze dressing for use on central venous (CVC) nontunneled catheters, inserted via the jugular vein. Skin colonization at...
متن کاملGuidelines for the prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections: recommendations relevant to interventional radiology.
THE revised version of the Centers for Disease Control Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheterrelated Infections was published on August 9, 2002, in the Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Reports and Recommendations series (1). It replaces the previous guideline published in 1996. The goal of the new guidelines is to provide evidencebased recommendations for preventing cathet...
متن کاملPrevention of intravascular catheter-related infections.
PURPOSE To review the literature on prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. DATA SOURCES The MEDLINE database, conference proceedings, and bibliographies of review articles and book chapters were searched for relevant articles. Primary authors were contacted directly if data were incomplete. STUDY SELECTION Studies met the following criteria unless otherwise stated: Trials ...
متن کاملUsing maximal sterile barriers to prevent central venous catheter-related infection: a systematic evidence-based review.
BACKGROUND Catheter-related infections cause increased morbidity, mortality, and health care costs. Infection control experts advocate using maximal sterile barriers to reduce the incidence of these infections. Low compliance rates suggest that clinicians are not convinced or are not aware that available data support adopting this more cumbersome, time-consuming, and relatively more expensive t...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America
دوره 36 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2003